Part 7/9:
One of the stronger aspects of Nakamoto's argument highlighted the increased difficulty for governments to intervene in Bitcoin transactions. The cost of state coercion escalates when attempting to enforce regulations or seize assets directly from users, which calls into question the traditional monopoly of force exerted by governments.
He candidly stated that despite potential theories suggesting that Bitcoin could be designed as a tool for government control, its very architecture renders it a subversion of state power. Bitcoin represents a resilient alternative to centralized systems, thus embodying the anarchist paradigm.