Part 4/8:
When asked whether the suggestion that citizens could advocate for legal changes might be perceived as advocacy from the court, Justice Timmer clarified that it's purely educational. The court's role is to interpret the law as passed by the legislature, and any dissatisfaction resides within the legislative domain, not the judiciary. This approach aims to encourage civic engagement without crossing into advocacy, aligning with the court's responsibilities.
Unanimity among the justices regarding this initiative was confirmed by Timmer, who stated that all colleagues are in favor of using AI to promote transparency. The justices review all communications to ensure accuracy and coherence, with a strong emphasis on maintaining the court's integrity.