Part 3/8:
The discussions emphasize the thin line between “being related” and “being family.” Real family would never exploit boundaries for monetary gain, yet blood ties don’t always guarantee loyalty. The individual elements bringing forth unity in a family do not always stand strong in the crucible of financial motives.
There's a collective lamentation over how money can change relationships. The argument suggests that when the chips are down, often familial support transforms into a landscape of "what’s mine is mine," where suddenly, the "we" transforms into "you." There’s a glaring inconsistency in loyalty once financial expectations are dashed, and the conversation reveals a fear of reckoning with that reality.