Part 3/7:
The Argument Against Lowered Standards
Critics of the new legislation contend that lowering standards to attract more candidates is misguided. They argue that effective teaching requires a solid foundation in essential skills, and allowing prospective teachers to bypass these fundamental assessments could lead to a decline in educational quality.
Drawing an analogy, one commentator likened the situation to cardiologists being exempt from identifying vital organs during medical training. If teachers cannot demonstrate basic competencies, how can they effectively educate students? This critique underscores a broader sentiment: standards are in place not only to ensure professional capability but also to uphold the integrity of educational institutions.