Part 3/8:
One of the core arguments made in support of Trump’s drastic proposals is that the current paradigm is failing—50 years of status quo has yielded little progress for the involved nations, including Israel and Gaza. With tragic recent events heightening the urgency of restoring stability, some suggest it may be time for bold solutions instead of the status quo that has led to countless frustrations.
Trump's idea to buy territories, contrasted with traditional approaches where the U.S. provides aid or enters foreign conflicts, posits a new form of involvement—domination rather than support. It aligns, supporters argue, with the "America First" ethos. If U.S. control could stabilize a region, it could, in theory, solve multiple problems at once—both at home and abroad.