Part 7/9:
Gino's case raised serious questions around academic integrity, the efficacy of peer review, and the pressure to publish within the competitive arena of behavioral science. Although Gino sought to portray herself as a victim in the narrative, public sentiment increasingly felt aligned with the integrity of the whistleblowers instead. A GoFundMe campaign in support of Data Colada exceeded its funding goal, highlighting widespread support for these researchers committed to exposing fraud.