Part 4/6:
During the discussion, the role of Elon Musk emerged as a significant point of contention. Mr. Jordan defended Musk’s activities as beneficial in exposing government inefficiencies. He acknowledged that while Musk owns substantial government contracts, he felt it was essential to allow the administration the liberty to conduct oversight without heavy constraints. He refuted the notion that there should be strict limitations on Musk, claiming that the American public largely supports Musk’s endeavors given the context of government spending.