Part 5/10:
Adding to the intrigue is Parker's claim regarding Holder’s past relationship with Qualcomm’s largest lobbying firm, raising suspicions about possible conflicts of interest. The DOJ under Holder, Parker alleges, was visiting their website extensively around the same time as the litigation. He expressed concern over the nature of these visits, which warranted his Freedom of Information Act request—yet, he received no satisfactory explanation.
Qualcomm Strikes Back
After Parker's appearance on a media platform to discuss these issues, Qualcomm reacted swiftly, demanding that Parker desist from speaking publicly about his experiences or the case. Their subsequent legal maneuvering to gag Parker has drawn public scrutiny and criticism.