Part 7/10:
There's a conflicting aspect to Trump's proposal: if the government intends to spend these accumulated funds on various initiatives, including social services, infrastructure, and other policies, this raises further ambiguity. The U.S. government has a history of spending beyond its income, leading to overextending financial commitments that could limit future investments into the sovereign wealth fund.
Moreover, the expansion of government spending could divert necessary funds away from critical investments that Trump has indicated he would prioritize, thus leaving the prospect of a substantial "piggy bank" overshadowed by the reality of existing budgetary constraints.