Part 6/9:
In continuation of this line of reasoning, the speaker expressed a strong view against sanctuary cities, arguing they should face financial repercussions. This assertion centered on the belief that Congress should legislate the defunding of such cities, ultimately conditioning federal funding on compliance with immigration enforcement efforts.
This perspective ties back to a broader critique of federal spending practices, where the control and oversight by Congress over bureaucratic agencies and administrative actions are increasingly questioned. The argument posits that if taxpayer funding is handled without accountability, bureaucracies will continue operating inefficiently or engage in behavior that is misaligned with the public's interest.