Part 3/6:
The analysis posits that Trump’s negative rhetoric serves a dual purpose: it seeks to soften Zelensky’s political stance and position him as a more malleable partner in potential negotiations. By applying pressure through criticism, Trump may believe he can offer a deal that Zelensky feels compelled to accept, despite any prior resistance.
However, critics argue this is not how one should negotiate with an ally. Instead, some characterize Trump’s tactics as analogous to a desperate sale; by undermining Zelensky, Trump risks devaluing Ukraine's position and leverage in any discussions. The implication is that Trump's apparent eagerness for a deal may inadvertently lead to unfavorable terms for Ukraine.