Part 7/8:
In the event of a severe conflict escalation, where Russian aggression leads to a NATO response, the prospect of using nuclear weapons arises as one of the most precarious contingencies. The idea of preemptive nuclear strikes is presented as an enormously risky gamble, which could spiral into unmanageable devastation, affecting major cities in both the Western and Eastern spheres.
The argument against this escalation emphasizes that conventional means should be the preferred strategy to counter any aggression, while avoiding escalation to nuclear options should remain a priority.