Part 5/8:
Several tests presented in the video have drawn skepticism regarding their relevance and realistic conditions. One notable example involved testing how well the systems performed in circumstances involving fog and smoke. Critics argue that using smoke instead of real fog oversimplifies the challenges roads pose during inclement weather and does not reflect a driver’s real-world experiences.
Additionally, some of the tests involved scenarios, like a wall of water, which participants noted were not common in everyday driving conditions. This brings attention to the quality and applicability of the tests, leading to doubts about their effectiveness in assessing safety and performance concerning real-life situations.