Both Au and Ag are materials used in the industry, so I think they will be used also in 100 years. Most electronic devices, from cars to phones have a certain amount of Au, Ag and Cu in them, Cu being the most used. That Au is shinny and used in jewelry is another discussion, but from the industrial point of it, it is still present. Might be replaced by In for plating, but this is still very far in the future.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
But the industrial usage of gold is far less than most/all other metals. Jewelry is a very specific product than can easily be recycled back into gold.
So do you think gold might lose its status to Bitcoin as a store of value?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It is far less used, because it is expensive. Everyone would rather use Au instead of Ag, Sn and some others but the price is prohibitive.
BTC and Au are two different asset classes which not exclude each other as they might be even complementary. Without electricity and internet, BTC is useless but if you want to transport bigger sums than BTC is better than Au. Each has it's perks.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
And yeah I haven't really though about gold being more used if it was cheaper at least compared to other metals. But I think Silver still has some unique qualities like being able sterilize, doesn't it?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Ag is the best conductive material, but is not as corrosive resistant as Au. Ag is also tarnishes, losing it's conductive properties where Au doesn't. Au is also an antibacterial and not toxic material and is used in medicine for this, even if we have cheaper alternatives.
As a fun note, Au is used as a lubricant in the industry sometimes :)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
lol, I just always took the 2% of gold mined is used in the industry for granted and never really thought about it. Guess there will be a significantly rising demand for gold in the industry as well.
Thanks for commenting your take!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think Bitcoin could gain the status as the de-facto new money standard. Then I would expect that every individual would (according to his risk assessment) hold a certain amount of his wealth in gold, for example to hedge the risk that some fatal bug in Bitcoin's code should be found.
yes or a hedge against global power outages that would make bitcoin nearly unusable.
I always thought of Crypto and precious metals being a good combo against huge Crash, but I think the non-Crash/soft Crash scenario is getting more likely in which only Bitcoin really shines.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta