On the one hand, it's really sad, because we could have more active people on the list. On the other hand, it is even positive as we are having more unused activities in the database. But without a doubt I would like to see more people involved.
Happy to hear it! Yeah, it's hard to cover every time zone. It is not going to fit everyone's schedule. I have to listen to things on replay too sometimes.
Dont you think there is still a big value in bringing the information over to the chain rather then let the AI train on "foreign" data. What I mean is I understand that it has to be trained on information currently on the web, but if we dont want the same garbage propaganda innour ai it might be good to have our own information source, just like leoglossary.
Maybe doesnt make any sense but hope you can follow my thought?
It does both. The LLM is trained on the general internet. But not everything is included in there. This is especially true as Reddit and X lock down their sites from scraping (a lot, if not all, are going to do this).
As for the point, yes we want to bring info over, and get it on chain. Plus we want comment and engagement with it which adds value to it.
Anything you post on threads is feeding #leoai. It is really that simple. So having a wide range of content, like some local knowledge of your town that isnt necessary on the web could add to the database.
How does one actually teach what might be true or false for the ai?
Im if I started a satire account on Inleo an posted alternative history and present its as facts. Can we somehow tell the ai that this info is "satire" or fake?
If that is the only thing related to it, then no. Same as it you posted a website with that content and it is lndexed by google. If there were thousands of other sites that disagreed with it, your site would be buried.
On the one hand, it's really sad, because we could have more active people on the list. On the other hand, it is even positive as we are having more unused activities in the database. But without a doubt I would like to see more people involved.
Yeah, that's really sad.
Oh, you're one of the bots too
You need to bot up. LOL
Haha you believe I am AI
That is true. People need to get more active. But that is adding a lot to the database for #leoai.
That sees everything.
Yeah listened to you call with @lisamgentile1961 yesterday. Just keep adding unique data to make LeoAI kore valuable.
Thanks for taking the time to listen and post your questions. There is no lack of content out there. Just need to bring it here.
Liked the show, usually listen to the recordings because its in the middle of the night for me :)
Happy to hear it! Yeah, it's hard to cover every time zone. It is not going to fit everyone's schedule. I have to listen to things on replay too sometimes.
Without a doubt. Every thread is fed into #leoai. I dont think people realize the full implications of that.
Have a question regarding your call yesterday.
Dont you think there is still a big value in bringing the information over to the chain rather then let the AI train on "foreign" data. What I mean is I understand that it has to be trained on information currently on the web, but if we dont want the same garbage propaganda innour ai it might be good to have our own information source, just like leoglossary.
Maybe doesnt make any sense but hope you can follow my thought?
It does both. The LLM is trained on the general internet. But not everything is included in there. This is especially true as Reddit and X lock down their sites from scraping (a lot, if not all, are going to do this).
As for the point, yes we want to bring info over, and get it on chain. Plus we want comment and engagement with it which adds value to it.
Anything you post on threads is feeding #leoai. It is really that simple. So having a wide range of content, like some local knowledge of your town that isnt necessary on the web could add to the database.
How does one actually teach what might be true or false for the ai?
Im if I started a satire account on Inleo an posted alternative history and present its as facts. Can we somehow tell the ai that this info is "satire" or fake?
If that is the only thing related to it, then no. Same as it you posted a website with that content and it is lndexed by google. If there were thousands of other sites that disagreed with it, your site would be buried.