It is funny how many quality content are undervalued and not getting any upvotes but some contents that are repeatedly posted and does not contribute to the community gets $20+.
If you have a big audience, you'll get a lot of votes, even for a low quality post. If you have no audience, it doesn't really matter how good the post is. It may not be 100% fair, but it's better than most reward systems.
It's not a perfect system, no. But if you're consistent, you should be able to make progress by adding value to the ecosystem. Others that share your views and find your articles insightful will certainly upvote you.
No, not fair.
You can change it. Buy more tokens. Upvote those quality content posts. Make it fair.
Quality content is one of the parameters, not the standalone parameter....that is how DPoS works.....
So if u think that on the premise of quality alone u wanna gorw or earn then u need to revisit your contemplation
If you have a big audience, you'll get a lot of votes, even for a low quality post. If you have no audience, it doesn't really matter how good the post is. It may not be 100% fair, but it's better than most reward systems.
I guess that's one of the best explanation:)
More HP = More followers and influence, perhaps?
More followers = More votes = More HP = More influence
Few things in life are fair. But the difference here is that you can impact it by staking more to your account.
That's why I always try to grow my account:)
It's not a perfect system, no. But if you're consistent, you should be able to make progress by adding value to the ecosystem. Others that share your views and find your articles insightful will certainly upvote you.
That's what I do right now instead of complaining:)