I think my view may be not so common but I think it would be good to upvote a well formulated argument even if you may disagree with the conclusion.
Of course, ultimately value is subjective but think arguments can be made as to what kind of moderation is in line with our shared objective of growing the platform.
But hell what do I know 🤷♂️
In my opinion, an individual disagreeing with an author's conclusion should be free to downvote. However, if they do find said author's argument to be well-formulated, the downvote should probably be a 0% downvote, so as to establish disagreement without hampering the author's earnings.
I'm down with that!