Not for all devs/projects. But for those who are not supported by BT, it becomes really difficult to get funded. We are in a somewhat similar situation as for witnesses.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not for all devs/projects. But for those who are not supported by BT, it becomes really difficult to get funded. We are in a somewhat similar situation as for witnesses.
It's a tough one - I'm painfully aware that it's even worse than it appears - I know the alpha account is basically Trades too, but on the other hand there's so much liquid Hive out there it's possible for someone with large enough pockets to buy enough to compete.
I can't really hold it against Blocktrades for holding a larger stake than everyone else!
It is something I find most interesting - how decentralised is Hive compared to other Chains - it seems to be very centralised, but then again in terms of how much it would potentially cost you to gain significant governance rights it's not that centralised - but that's probably a silly measure.
Thinking like that is also possibly my pro-Hive bias - wanting to find an analytical trick to prove it's not really centralised at all.
Maybe I'm just kidding myself.
Do you know who controls the Freedom account? Dan or Ned I presume? Or is that Trades too?
At least Trades is prepared to put a face to his account name, that's something at least, maybe?