Well, it's better. But you'll still have people just coming to dump stuff for the extra rewards. Where's the niche? Niche over numbers i think. There's no reason for me to come & look at the community.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well, it's better. But you'll still have people just coming to dump stuff for the extra rewards. Where's the niche? Niche over numbers i think. There's no reason for me to come & look at the community.
I do still want to ultimately maintain the freedom of speech - I think keeping rewards to 0 would sort of limit the principle, since someone posting regular content isn't doing anything wrong. Adding the incentive of significantly increased curation would definitely encourage people to add a compliment (i.e. doubling or tripling curation % for adding a single compliment).
Right, i understand freedom of speech. Yet they can post whatever they want on their blog. How are you supporting freedom of speech? You're voting anything, sure low percentage, but why?
I do think that any content that's produced does still warrant acknowledgement. It's a way to say, "Yes, you did something, and I'm here to support what you say. We're here to support you." It could spur people to start posting and engaging.
ok. understood.
So, your thought on the hivewatchers stuff then? Are you interested in getting involved to help make improvements?
Oh, the idea you brought up a few days ago? I think it would be great to start up a newer, improved version. I think that a community-based approach which is more decentralized would really be a boon to the success of such a project.
Right, but we need quite a few peeps to help move this forward & get a decent structured plan/manifesto together & make a DHF proposal. Back of a matchbook figures and ideas i think we could do much more, helping educate, mentor, retain users in addition to whats being done now, at half the cost, or even less.
i really don't understand. Why not vote more meaningful, helpful, uplifting stuff like maybe, naturalmedicine, deepdives, whatever. i just dont see why you want lots of numbers. i mean, u can do what u want, but i just don't get it
Well again, the model does consist of voting much higher for the more meaningful content, but still not depriving those who want to post simpler, easy content, i.e. "snackable content," as I've seen it phrased. I think there's a place for such content on social media, hence I'd still like it to be around.
hmmmm. i'm not convinced. But so be it. :-)