You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: My Most Successful Post in Years (Promoting Hive) Was Just Downvoted by Curangel for Over $200 Right Before Payout

in LeoFinance3 years ago (edited)

not to mention the number of accounts he farms :

My Social Medias



Blog (everything but gaming): https://peakd.com/@kennyskitchen Videos (everything but gaming): https://odysee.com/@kennyskitchen:9 Blog (gaming): https://peakd.com/@kennysgaminglife Videos (gaming): https://odysee.com/@kennysgaminglife:

Sits down on his sofa and talk..............one account

Talks nonsence............ one account

Sings.............. one account

Says he is leaving hive but never leaves....................... one account

FARMING farming farming :)

and yes somehow he says.... I am the one who worries only about my pocketbook!!

image.png

What you say to that?

I say, THANK YOU, Kenny!!

Sort:  
Loading...

He has worked tirelessly curating hundreds of thousands of accounts bro! Look how active everyone he's curated is! The 20 people posting in their community should definitely continue to take more than 5% of the daily reward pool, it's only fair! If no it's censorship!!

FYI, this is the main delegation at tribesteemup account which he is using to self vote at 100%. Just did on this post after smooth's DV. All rewards are made liquid, so that he can farm out quickly.

image.png

FYI, this is the main delegation at tribesteemup account which he is using to self vote at 100%

I upvoted 2 posts of mine at 100% - both because you power-trippers had zero'd them out. Which is exactly what I recently posted I would be focusing on more: countering malicious downvotes.

As you well know, if you've actually looked at the history of either account at all, I receive well under 1% of the upvote-weight that TSU gives out.

All rewards are made liquid, so that he can farm out quickly.

No, all rewards on this one post were made liquid for three reasons:

  1. That way the curators get 9% of the rewards
  2. reward.app upvotes if you use them, meaning more support for the post.
  3. There are folks who will support content just because it's liquid-rewards, so I was hoping that might incentivize more folks to support this and bring the conversation into view.


I really find it hilarious how y'all can't see the irony of attacking us because you don't like the questions we ask or the evidence provide, all under the guise that we're just "conspiracy theorists" - and then you and acidyo both go around spreading obviously lies, which can easily be seen by anyone who looks at the chain.

I normally take no offense if people complain about me downvoting, people calling me names....but when people talk about me caring my pocket book I do take offense.