I domt think anyone stole anything.
I never said that you thought that. I said that if you're suggesting that the stake was moved there To BE stolen, in front of us with the community's consensus, then ...
And that is exactly what you've been suggesting, that somehow the more than a dozen witnesses, and numerous others who implemented the hf, didn't have a clear, transparent consensus regarding what to do with the stake, no, they had a SCHEME, and did it to profit somehow at a later date from it.
I think it was moved there without our being asked. It could have been moved somewhere else, but it was moved there.
It could have been moved but why? Why move it once only to move it again? Where else could it be moved? It obviously makes sense to many why it was the best option, and still is, because it's in the hands of the community to actually form a network wide consensus regarding the stake, which take time. Weeks if not months and which can only happen in an organic decentralized and transparent manner once those funds are there to be voted over by everyone.
I suspect some who want it there wish to remain anonymous actors. This is concerning.
You suspect that some people that hardforked want it there, and thus some do not, so where are those who object and why would they stay quiet and protect those you suspect forced them essentially?
We don't know who was involved in the decision.
Yes we do. Stop the nonsensical insanity if "we don't know". Clearly consensus happened between numerous people and clearly this was the best move and obviously it was the best move because it gives a perfect use case for a true decentralized network wide development / direction funding consensus via the organic doa.
We know it is reserved for development. We don't know what development means.
You're being obtuse. First it was the who did it, now it's the 'what for'.. It's development, look it up in a dictionary. It could also be frozen, or airdroped to everyone, so what? You know this. Wth.
The money in the dao represents likely inflation amd debt. This has been decided as the default.
Who decided it? Why?
Smh . You know who. And you know why, but you act as if it's a total mystery that could never be solved. The fund being a certain size represents only one thing and that's the potential funding for one day. The likelihood of that representing in turn some liabilities rests entirely on what is decided by the community, and thus it has absolutely nothing to do with "who put the ninjamined stake there and why". I'm sure that you'll not become exceedingly desperate as you implicates the ones who hardforked of some kind of scheme.
I just want answers. I already got them from some kind understanding and polite people. Thank youbfor yours, too.