I work for a public school district, so if you know my name, my annual salary is in a database that a "watchdog group" FOIA's every single year. There is pretty much zero privacy. They think the public is entitled to see where their tax dollars are going at the expense of all the employees privacy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Didn't know there was this amount of transparency in the states. Interesting.
Mostly for state and federal employees.
Seriously?
If you work for the public funded by the public, transparency for the public is expected.
Value plan for example, gets paid by public funds but doesn't want to be transparent with their expenses. Would the public trust them under that practice?
There are eyewitness accusations of theft by fraud of Valueplan disbursements, and when confronted about those specific accusations, Valueplan principals flatly refused to provide documentary proof, receipts, that no fraud occurred.
I have zero trust for Valueplan because they have refused to account for expenditures that were alleged to be fraudulent. They have earned my mistrust. Ya'll can trust whoever you want with your money, but when I demand receipts in this circumstance and am refused, I will not again let them spend my money.
Ever.
I'm just going to say I disagree and those are two totally different examples, not even close to being an apples to apples comparison.
Who does the DHF belong to? It belongs to Hive stakeholders, since there's no corporation that owns Hive, Inc.
That makes the DHF public money.
So, do you not have a right to know how your money is being spent?
I'd appreciate a simple yes or no to that specific question.
I'm sure you would.
The fact you didn't provide one is all the answer that matters.
Fair enough, for me it's your attitude and approach that matters and sadly you failed on both counts.
Public employee does not want their salary public. Go figure.