It would be interesting to hear what his reasoning was for the vote on the return proposal and then the sudden reversal on it. I've never interacted with BT, so I don't want to assume anything, but it doesn't make a lot of sense to me. It also seems kind of shady at face value. I'd love some clarity on it. When this whole thing happened, "centralization" wasn't even the first or fifth thing that came to mind for me. Especially after I looked at how close some of the proposals were to still making the cut. They weren't that fart off, it could have easily been doable for them.
I think it was in response to the Leo proposal getting funded.