I second that I've looked at a few accounts and been blown away by their stake and lack of activity. It's all automated and out side of following a vote trail is not contributing in a meaningful way. In fact, it's there are a lot of accounts with a fair amount of engagement that are not being rewarded as there is a higher level of centralized money on the chain that seems to follow a very similar curation trial.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A lot of what they vote is shit based on past connections . Perhaps if they got out and actually read a bit more, they would adjust their voting and find people a bit more worthy.
With this being a blockchain it’s easy to see that there is a clear bias of these votes for fairly dense amount of accounts. It’s great if you’re in the in crowd and I don’t want to sound like I’m mad about votes. It’s your stake do what you want with it but the optics of the rich getting richer while quality content goes under rewarded is not a great look.