Yes there is a definite need for change on how these funds are distributed and even more reason to grow the stake so our votes count. I am just disappointed when I see these types of figures as you question how is Hive benefitting from this as it is clearly not about Hive. I do not think having someone involved in the decision making should also have a project that is being funded either as there is a definite conflict of interest and is a serious no no. This would not be allowed to happen in the business world so why here? Sounds like what we see with government officials awarding themselves a tender, but at least that happens under another name. I am not saying they are crooked it is just not how things are allowed to happen.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's great to have these kinds of discussions. We need to use our funds wisely. Just because we have a large budget doesn't mean we should spend it all.