Downvoting needs to be eliminated, like yesterday, if HIVE wants to have any chance of surviving, long term, that is. First we'll get a pump to get out on though . . . I'm not sticking around to see what the nitwits at the top do.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Downvotes are a thing for a reason set forth in the whitepaper.
If you choose to go, that is on you.
More cheap hive for everyone else.
What do you demonstrate when you take as unchangeable what is changeable? Being in a whitepaper is not set in stone, nor would anyone suggest that it should stay that way just because it's in a whitepaper. Everything we do always starts out as less than we want, and we do it with expectations of changing things for the better. EVERYTHING.
Once you see that change in any particular is very unlikely, you modify your decision making.
But that's what really sets you apart.
Sorry.
Oh, at a price I guess. But I'm in no hurry. Let me know if you want to bid. 😜
Clearly, imo, this is an opportunity for the rules to change us.
Just because you don't the esoteric, doesn't mean none of us do.
If we change all the rules to suit ourselves, what would we be left with?
Nobody wants to play that game, let me assure you.
HIVE only survives as a real viable social media if the negative incentives are eliminated. You can't reward negative behavior and expect good things to happen.
We just saw another example, which doesn't seem like that big of deal in the grand scheme of things, but as a lesson in what negative rewarding leads to, it was classic.
To each his/her own, but to play the social media game, you've at least got to get the basic rules right.
Said another way, only a fool tries to reinvent the wheel. ;-)
Cheers
Black or White.
I think we will take our chances.
You are welcome to stay if you create original content you'd like to share with us.