It's frustrating and a little bit weird, to be sure.
As much as anything, it makes me ponder whether we're actually looking at the "Achilles Heel" of decentralization, here... this slightly twisted reality in which there's actually very little leadership precisely because everyone is too concerned with their own little projects to be able to work together towards a "common" good that works out for everybody involved.
There are probably "Decentralization Maximalists" who'd argue against LeoFinance because it's not "really" decentralized because there's actually someone managing and driving the ship rather than an endless clusterfu*k of (non)decision making by committee. The thing about good and directed leadership is that it moves things along at a swift pace, rather than a snail's pace.
But I could easily get into an essay-length response here, so I'll stop now!
=^..^=
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well, I think one can discuss and argue about centralization or decentralization for years actually..
I mean, are things really decentralized when stake is what decides more or less everything?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta