It may vary by state but in many cases if a child uses a firearm owned by a parent then the parent will be charged. The problem I have with this is that it is automatic (or nearly so). In many cases maybe that is appropriate but I think all of the circumstances have to be considered. Also, if we are talking about a "child" that is going to be charged as an adult, I think that should absolve the parents (at least from a legal standpoint). You can't have it both ways.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I see, it makes sense to absolve the parents if the perp is being tried as an adult. I too think it's problematic because every situation is unique. Thanks for the insight it is very well appreciated.