Maybe funding from the DHF and Value Plan should be given to projects that have a proven track record of onboarding useful people to the chain. These are the people who can influence Hive price afterall, so it just makes sense that the projects that are bringing the biggest impact be the ones that continue to get funding. The problem here is how different people define impact. For some people, it's real world impact. For others, it's impact on price. This is where the division on how useful Value Plan's funds are being spent arises.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You're right, however it's probably going to take very long for us to get to this level where we start doing something about valueplan.
Some stakeholders do not really like it and many of them have expressed their distaste towards it, but so far, nothing has been happening.
It might take something more serious to enact that change