All 3 are just options for people to write short content and engage more. We could’ve just created Waves and that’s it, but why we need tribalism in decentralized space.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
All 3 are just options for people to write short content and engage more. We could’ve just created Waves and that’s it, but why we need tribalism in decentralized space.
yes. I agree. The feature is looking good to be honest. The notification is always the best feature on ecency. I wish you fix the points system and we are golden ha ha
What’s broken in Points system that we can fix?
I have raised this before and you ( the team ) do/es not agree. The curation buy using points should be straightforward if that's an option. There are so many subjective parameters. That's my view though.
We cannot make boosting automated and any solution we use end up being abused or will be subjective. So what we have seem like decent. If you have practical solution and detailed research facts please create post about improvement proposal. We will gladly support and implement it if viable 👍
I just think that it should be scrapped if there is subjectivity with upvotes bought using points.
Upvotes are not bought, you just request to be in review queue. Conception of buying giving it wrong impression hence wrong expectation. You don’t have to use it though, scrapping feature is easy than building new use case.
Appreciate you are giving your opinion and feedback on this, we will discuss more new use cases with team and gradually discontinue controversial ones.
@ecency there’s a significant disconnect in the UX because you guys are changing all links to Ecency.com.
Will you guys end this practice? If a user links leofinance.io in their post you auto-change all the links.
@ecency we’re getting dozens of complaints like this. When will you guys stop changing links to Ecency.com?
Hey @khaleelkazi, good to hear from you! Ecency users asking from you to ask from us to change links? On Leofinance they are not changed, on Ecency.com we do this because content is available on blockchain and can be accessed so we want convenience for Ecency users. I hope it makes sense, we do give or state canonical origin so search engine can define origin of content. It is similar or just like on Ecency people can sign transactions separately and on Leofinance separate, they can surf separate but interact with same content on chain.
Hmmm if I check the canonical, it tries to rank as Ecency.com tho?
We've found some incompatibility issues which is why it was brought to my attention. Users do want to use Ecency for some stuff but they're running into issues when they try to access links posting related to our UI
We can fix those, if you know examples or point me into reporting link. I am in your discord server if you want to ping me there for quick reference! 🙏
We use
hivescript, standard for all front ends to follow and give canonical links, have you changed a structure of Leofinance recently? http://github.com/ecency/hivescript@khaleelkazi just to follow up on this, we did double check, you are including
canonical_urlinsidejson_metadataand that should already be respected as per this line of code: https://github.com/ecency/ecency-vision/blob/development/src/common/helper/entry-canonical.ts#L15I don't know how you checked canonicals but it is pointing correct source.
Quick question, backend system you have built, for main threads it only accepts if thread is published from leofinance, is there plans to lift that restriction?
We have leothreads feed and publishing on Ecency.com with most recent update, if you guys had that limit with intention and plan to keep that as is, we can remove those options from Ecency so it won't cause some confusion. Please do let us know! Thanks!