Damn you just reminded me I was supposed to talk about how we need individual downvotes on proposals rather than blanket downvoting with the return proposal.
Knew I was forgetting something.
Also yes ValuePlan does a lot of things and creates a lot of drama.
It's how the Hive rally car gets funded for one.
This was one of my recommendations as well, as CBRS funded renovating a classroom with expenditures of ~.1% of Valueplan's, and they should not have to secure ~$65M worth of stake weight to fund such a small project (which wasn't funded through the DHF at all, but I felt was a good example of the kinds of projects folks would like to see come from the DHF).
Another I consider necessary is that stake can only be spent out of the DHF once. Each of us has a proportionate stake in the DHF to our stake in Hive tokens, and once we vote to expend that portion of our stake in the DHF, we should no longer have a say in how others spend their portion of the DHF. This, I believe, would cause people to more carefully consider voting for spending the DHF funds, and would concomitantly set a higher bar for beneficence of proposals in return for providing funding.
Interesting take.
Not sure how it would be implemented but that certainly could help people think harder about what they want funded. The entire DAO would have to be rewritten so I give that a slim to none chance. It would have to work more like Kickstarter or something... which I also don't know how works it exactly.