I have no 100% answer to this question. My initial guess was - I got ban because I had initiated (by mistake) a LEO power-down last month. Which I canceled after several hours. No real unstake payout on my .leo sub-account ever took place. But then I saw a 2.17 LEO staked as LeoAds reward to my main acct, which is now powering down all LEO, non stop since late January. Yet, 2.17 Leoads received. I'm totally confused...
Perhaps eligibility requirements are NOT the same for all participants. Or - them are applied selectively, under some unknown ( to me) scheme.
not sure how it exactly work, just from things i remember hearing. i saw that you made some threads on the main, but non on leo in the last month, that was the only thing i am basing it on.
It seems your account confused the system because you initiated a simultaneous undelegation + unstake + cancel unstake all in a very short period of time
So it considered some small amount of your stake as eligible (about 2100 LEO) which was the amount of LEO POWER you had that was in limbo (not unstaked, not undelegating and not cancel unstaked)
Going to have to scratch our heads and figure out how this tricked the snapshot. Your account should have received 0 LEO. So I guess you got a few free this month
In all these other comments: there is no conspiracy. Anyone can run these numbers with the same parameters and get the same results.
To everyone spreading fud: stop. It’s stupid. If you are that concerned, then run the numbers yourself and cross-check how you get this conclusion.
All of these complainers are making me simply want to go back to buy and burn. It’s annoying.
I have no 100% answer to this question. My initial guess was - I got ban because I had initiated (by mistake) a LEO power-down last month. Which I canceled after several hours. No real unstake payout on my .leo sub-account ever took place. But then I saw a 2.17 LEO staked as LeoAds reward to my main acct, which is now powering down all LEO, non stop since late January. Yet, 2.17 Leoads received. I'm totally confused...
Perhaps eligibility requirements are NOT the same for all participants. Or - them are applied selectively, under some unknown ( to me) scheme.
you did not post on your leo account for a month, but you did post on your main. Maybe it was that.
BOTH my accounts made zero root level posts last month, made about the same amt of upvotes (hundreds) and at least 15-20 thread posts.
BOTH my accounts made power down attempts last month
Yet, Low LEO stake main acct got 2.17 of Leoads, while the main LEO stake holding .leo sub-account got 0.00 (none)
There must be some other considerations behind such outcome. Yet unknown to me.
I have one version, but dont want to say it open. Dont want to be accused again in FUD or/and slandering.
not sure how it exactly work, just from things i remember hearing. i saw that you made some threads on the main, but non on leo in the last month, that was the only thing i am basing it on.
Hmmm I looked into this
It seems your account confused the system because you initiated a simultaneous undelegation + unstake + cancel unstake all in a very short period of time
So it considered some small amount of your stake as eligible (about 2100 LEO) which was the amount of LEO POWER you had that was in limbo (not unstaked, not undelegating and not cancel unstaked)
Going to have to scratch our heads and figure out how this tricked the snapshot. Your account should have received 0 LEO. So I guess you got a few free this month
In all these other comments: there is no conspiracy. Anyone can run these numbers with the same parameters and get the same results.
To everyone spreading fud: stop. It’s stupid. If you are that concerned, then run the numbers yourself and cross-check how you get this conclusion.
All of these complainers are making me simply want to go back to buy and burn. It’s annoying.