We've been having this conversation in an empty room for over six months.
There is no insight left to be extracted from this discussion.
A daisy chain of liabilities strung together pretending to be assets...
Oh wait I'm doing it again.
I grow weary of this circular conversations based on unproven assumptions.
It's tiring to be told these things are "simple" and "easy to get" when I'm the one with the blog and have the comments of real people saying they have no idea what the fuck is going on. It's ironically an insult to intelligence to fall back on these generalizations and then project the idea that I'm the one being over-emotional and irrational.
You have less than 30 blog posts on your account over the last 4 year cycle, and literally none of them are about this super complex topic that you like to pretend is simple. Go explain it to people and show me they get it. If it's so simple teach someone this issue and have them debate me on it. See what happens.
But the projection doesn't stop there because I've had the tactical high-ground in this discussion the entire time. The burden of proof is on your camp to prove beyond a doubt that this thing is going to work. It's not a wing-it situation where we fuck around and find out. It's much easier to argue doing nothing than vampire attacking the current system and completely changing it all at once with zero prototype or proof-of-concept.
So when you say things to me like: "I support AMM and I would run the code if you wrote it." Yeah, right back at you x10 on that front. Just make the prototype and stop theory-crafting. Nobody on the chain seems impressed by either of us. This is a waste of breath. As you well know by now: saying things and bringing them to life are completely different magnitudes.
It’s just DeFi with a stable coin bond as the main unit of collateral. That is easy to understand. I don’t need explain it further. Everyone can digest and understand that.
The prototype / POC is the US government bond sales mechanism which is so over subscribed the country can run the world’s biggest naval force with it, plus the other prototype / POC is DeFi, which has been proven.
I can’t make the prototype, but as far as I understand core team is moving the lock on HBD to one year instead of 3 days. That is the first step.
I’m not hear to talk things into life, I’m here to provide a counter view to someone like u who thinks it’s a bad idea to make DeFi on hive with HBD bonds as the main unit of collateral. IMO that view is anti hive and severely limits what hive can do. Someone has to counter u. Might as well be me.
I don’t post. Imagine, I have posted more comments on ur blog talking about this issue than I have done posts on my own blog.
I have made significant amounts of content about this issue on the CTT Poscast however. So it’s not fair to say I haven’t posted about it. Just not from my own personal blog
That's just more projection I'm the one here countering a view that nobody else has countered yet. So far without me in the mix it's just been an echo chamber of "bonds are great and we are going to be the next world reserve currency". Honestly I find the mental gymnastics and gaslighting to be pretty alarming for a topic like this that thus far has been way out on the fringe.
But if u feel that way about DeFi with HBD bond as the main unit of collateral, I’m afraid ur not getting it. That system is great. I cannot believe u don’t feel the same way about it. No mental gymnastics and no gaslighting needed.
It’s not on the fringe, the timlock code is easy to implement and it’s being worked on
You are legit trying to rewrite history. You and Taskmaster and TheyCallMeDan have been pitching this idea unabated for years and then I pop up on the scene to provide some opposition and now you frame the situation like I'm the powerful tyrant trying to strongarm the network while you're the selfless freedom fighter standing up for the little guy.
No actually I'm the one providing the pushback to this idea that's been floating around that nobody has challenged this entire time. Seriously mindblowing. You don't need to provide the counterview. I am the counterview. You guys had the stage for years; with a bigger audience I might add.
I don’t think so. I’m just countering your view. It’s free speech bud. All people are allowed to take the counter view and post about it.
I generally stay quiet but on such matters I’ll speak. Let the people who read this one day decide what they want to do.
At least they will be informed if they decide to read this. They can then make their own decisions with both view points available to them. And maybe they won’t think this idea is as insane as you are making it out to be
If u gave more balanced view it would be better tho
More gaslighting, eh?
Trying to frame me as someone who doesn't believe in free speech?
Trying to accuse me of making the claim that you don't have the right to disagree?
Trying to accuse me of bias and having some kind of hidden agenda?
As if this analysis I've given isn't actually the real conclusion I've come to?
Even though I've already overtly stated that being wrong benefits me?
Very cute.
Hm, yes, I can tell.
Stay on point. Now ur completely off topic and taking things very very personally. There is no need for this at all. U interpret things how u like. It doesn’t mean that any of the things u are saying were my intention. I completely reject all of the above accusations.
Your above message is highly personal however and is not discussing the topic at hand.
I reject everything u say in the above. Seems u are just hurting.
But please don’t let the next message become threatening as that seems to be where it is going.
Let’s keep it on topic and not make this personal. I can play that game too if u would like