but isn't the state of AGI not about the programmability of such? isn't AGI beyond reinforcement learning? ie by learning based on input and response? but by 'thinking' on its own? question is: can we reach true AGI? I tend to think it will
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Often when trying to explain the creative process, we struggle, because the finished product and all ideas involved, were not thought of (like we do when we communicate). Explained like: The mind is giving. Unsure of source. Just happens.
agree... I tend to go by my gut feeling, even with business decisions. I like to believe my unconsciousness is thinking like my conscious but better and feeds the gut feeling. Whenever I need to convince others ...
... I explain my gut feeling with logical arguments coming from my conscious thought processes. Irrespective of my gut feeling, reality shows am mostly successfully convincing others (especially in business, colleagues, customers) 😆
Can't be explained effectively, nor taught. Impossible to learn? Probably. Good luck, AI.
Super tired on this end. Gotta run. Ciao!
👋 🙃