You make a very good point. I've seen too many good content creators walk away for two reasons:
- total imbalance in rewards: crap and easy posts gets 10 to 100 times more rewards over quality posts
- no engagement
Even when large vote value owners use their auto voters to vote, I would argue they shall review their authors posts much more often. Added to that it would be great if they can include others as well, ie rotating their auto votes across a larger number of quality post producers. However, what I see at HIVE (been too short a time with Leo to know how this is at Leo), many of the high value auto voters rarely change their authors they support. The result, especially those who are getting large upvotes, some to more get lazy and start spending less time and foremost effort in their posts with the result that the overall quality of content is reduced.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think it comes and goes in waves, the crap it is. Never it was completely gone, and it never will. I have the 'feeling' whenever we change something big, a larger group of the community takes an extra effort again.
A key issue: The amount of interactions is low, even when we see a increase in the amount of comments made to the chain. I have less pleasure in writing and publishing when interaction stays rock bottom. Result: I write and post less. Others leave the platform when they dont see a social element, while I still believe in the concept in general and don't want to let go :)