Sort:  

I'd generally agree, but in the context of historical research, I actually prefer mentions to unlinked username references. Now there's room for disagreement on whether this post was valuable historical research. But at least I enjoyed seeing my name listed in this blockchain chronology.

Agreed!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

.

I don´t care . . . tagging 1700 people is SPAM. period.

Yep. A fucking dick move and attention seeking at best.

.

Is that supposed to be some sort of statement you say to spook me out or something? lol.

You can't even explain what the hell this spammy ass post is about let alone do a "deep dive" on me. Go check out the blog or whatever. It's a pretty hilarious read if you don't mind horrible grammar and MS-paint art.

ok. for the third and final time.. What is this post about / what are you researching to find?

.

Ah. Alright then.

If you need info beyond sifting through old articles and whatnot and need clarification on something don't be afraid to as someone on here. A lot of the accounts that you named above are still active and likely have better recollection of events than I do regarding most happenings.

Please refrain from the massve wall of names with @ signs in front of them as you're jut begging to get downvoted due to the fact that every single individiual present in that list got an alert on their browser, phone etc etc which is likely to cause a bit of backlash.

Steem / HIVE has a colourful past compared to other blockchains.. It's certainly at the very least a cautionary tale about how ninja premining by a private company can have dire effects on a public blockchain.

My entire net worth, assuming you could cover the bet and would pay, both of which which I doubt,

!popcorn