It is interesting what cannot be found on the net. One could say that everything and nothing can be found on the net.
The paradox and the constant contradiction in human existence is the principle that could be followed then.
That nothing can be relied on, not AI's, just as little as humans. Since everything is uncertain and nothing can be fixed, there are no real problems to be solved, but the occupation of the human mind is in and of itself both a problem and not a problem, it would probably be good if humans fed the machines with paradoxes, because then the AI would address these contradictions itself. To the extent that an AI recognises the philosophical writings, the millennia-old debates about human consciousness and existence as a result of the unsolvability of the contradictions, and as a result helps a human dialogue partner to come to the realisation that humanity is not a problem in need of a solution, it would be welcome to have such dialogues. Since we do not know, this question will make for polar views, like so much else.
Since no one is able to define intelligence, it is also not possible to define artificial intelligence. The interpretation is therefore left to the individual.
The ineffable, the undefinable, the incomprehensible defies calculation. It cannot be coded because it lives between the lines.