Solana-based decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol Solend tried to gain access to a whale account. The account in question is not closing its large margin position. It has 5.7 million sol tokens into Solend, accounting for more than 95% of deposits. As per Solend Labs, if Solana (SOL) drops in price and the whale gets liquidated, the lending platform may end up with "bad debt”. To avoid this potential risk that could cripple Solana's network and create chaos, the governance vote proposal SNLD1 was made and accepted to give "Emergency Powers" to Solend Labs. This would help them execute the liquidation process Over-The-Counter (OTC). Soon after they faced backlash from the community as so many people started condemning this act on Twitter. As per some users, it's better to get off the platform because Solend team can takeover any account whenever they want. Although Solend Labs did not vote on the proposal yet it doesn't change the fact that it is not as decentralized as they claim to be.
Another proposal SNLD2 was made to avoid the bad PR to cancel SNLD1 and it got accepted quickly. Good thing is that they did not take the direction that Juno Community faced a few months ago due to its bad airdrop design.
What Is Solend?
Solend is the leading algorithmic, decentralized protocol for lending and borrowing on Solana Network. Anyone can earn interest by lending their crypto assets and using their deposits as collateral for borrowing without any intermediary. Although it is faster and cheaper than AAVE and Compound, it definitely isn't as decentralized and robust. They are known to handle such transactions in the past without affecting the price of their native token or without burdening up the chains they support.
Liquidation Problem Still Exists
Solend is in a fucked up situation right now. They cannot risk taking over any account now because it could seriously hurt their reputation in DeFi community beyond repair. At the same time, the liquidation problem still exists. They need to find a workaround to avoid this. If the liquidation happens on-chain, it could simply dump SOL's price, also causing the chain to halt for the 100th time. Solend DEX liquidity isn't deep enough to handle such a large transaction. It could lead to liquidity spammers taking the advantage and further worsening the situation.
This is why it is very important to invest in protocols that think about worst-case scenarios and build proper ways to address them. This bear market is filtering out such projects and exposing their loopholes. What do you guys think? Comment below!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Interesting background. 👍🏻
Thanks for sharing.
Cheers mate. You are most welcome!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Very interesting background and well written post! To the point!
So if I got it right, the community voted to seize the assets and then another vote was taken to cancel/nullify the first one?
Fully upvoted ⬆️(ofc).
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
Thanks a lot @vlemon. You got it absolutely right. They are back to square one. 😂
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Once a principle is accepted, it is a slippery slope from there. It is not like these sentiments of recreating traditional finance in DeFi space is going to go away soon from the minds of these decision makers. I don't see much of a future with these people and projects like Solend. If anything was to be changed, it was the code. I can understand some drastic changes to tokenomics. Violation of property rights on the other hand is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable.
!PIZZA
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's is true. These protocol developers should think about scenarios like this one beforehand to avoid such mishaps in the future.
This makes me think about why regulation is so important in crypto.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Lol.
But all it takes to approve the takeover of addresses and all their assets is the vote of 1 single wallet?
Solana is centralised garbage.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Haha, I deliberately mentioned it as a "leading" and "Decentralized" 😂 Right now, it's none of them!
Not one single upvote. The platform has a handful of "whales" that favoured the takeover of the wallet and then changed their decision. Obviously Solend is one of those whales. But later on they clarified that they didn't take part in the any of the voting. Still doesn't change the fact that they have immense power to takeover user's funds.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Solana had a bunch of issues that people kept ignoring so the problems existed way before this became an issue. It's only being propped up by VCs so I don't think there is much they can do to solve this issue.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's right. This is just adding fuel to the fire. Bye Bye SOL.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people(@finguru) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
But wait ooo.... How does a decentralized protocol or platform seize people's assets..... I am confused 😕
Lol, that's what. Guess it is not decentralized at all.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
One of those VC chains – never going to touch those.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Good decision mate!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
These “labs” are beginning to scare me.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
LMAO. Doing failed experiments 99% of the time. 😂
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I think it has nothing to do with the people from a particular country. But yes mate, this is the harsh reality. SOL has been facing the heat a lot lately and this might not end well for the hodlers. I feel for you guys. ❤️
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta