You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Hivewatchers Dilemma

in LeoFinance2 years ago

I once had a run in with HW some time ago. They do a great job definitely, and still a few areas could be improved in how they work. I think their stand on AI content is not difficult - put the source of AI content. I would have had an issue if they completely outlawed AI assisted content.

To disband HW entirely without a better replacement will lead to mayhem. And their proposal could still stand. Maybe we could think of relaxing a bit the punishment for offenders, especially giving newbies a little more opportunity to correct their mistakes.

Like I said earlier, they could look inwards and see an area to improve. But for their work, its very much important here

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

I understand the emotion people have and I am not discounting that people are citing legitimate circumstances. Sadly, what is being stated does happen.

However, if we want improvement, we do need to push for solutions in addition to pointing out problems.

To me, a lot is solved with size and numbers. When we are operating in the millions, layer 2 becomes more important because communities will be the central focus for most.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I really love to work in numbers. I do think that hive has the capacity to attract numbers. It is quite possible in my area. I look forward to March 15th when the next marketing project would be kick-off. Hive is too good not to be liked by many.

I believe HW can fix their system so that those that leave are not scared away in error.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I believe HW can fix their system so that those that leave are not scared away in error.

I dont know enough about the internal workings of their system (like some others do) to forecast what is possible. However, it is worthy of discussion.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta