I just wanted to address what you called a downside, of having to stay focused and only write quality content otherwise it won't be rewarded.
Well, that doesn't seem like a downside to me at all.
You see, the curators you're looking for upvotes from, all have a sizable investment in LEO.
Investments that they want to see the value of, increase.
To achieve this, it's in their best interest to reward only quality, valuable content that will attract more eyeballs.
LeoFinance isn't a charity and rushed, poorly formatted content written in broken English just doesn't have any value.
It's unfortunate that some people sign up to try and make money blogging fast, then get upset when they don't see rewards.
But I guarantee if you're able to consistently write the type of content that's truly valuable, then curators will find and reward it.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
maybe I chose the wrong words for it. :)
Yes I understand from the investment point of view, as most of the big account are really investing big amount of money into the platform and making leofinance as it is now.
As I mention, I am pretty much happy with any rewards I get, because there are many things i get besides the rewards itself, such as new knowledge and trading system and trading tips. : )
Just like I said, having a small rewards are just way better than getting tons of like in facebook.
Oh exactly :)
Unlike on Facebook, upvotes on LeoFinance actually have a monetary value.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta