The type of content only has value to the front-end owners.
Did anyone ask them what they think?
Why wouldn't they want to monetise valuable AI content?
Its better than 99% (not exaggeration) than the content they publish now.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well maybe because the AI content is basically content written from AI learning from several authors and writing based on what it’s learnt. Difference here though is that in this case, neither the AI or the person tasking it to generate the text source the authors the ideas were taken from.
They might be better, but they still don’t give credit to the people that “inspired” the ai’s writing. If someone read another person’s article, learnt from it and wrote a post based on without sourcing them, we’d consider that plagiarism, right?