They need to ONLY curate leofinance.io content because that's where they earn ad revenue.
Why would they pay LEO for content on peakd.com which doesn't earn ad revenue?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
They need to ONLY curate leofinance.io content because that's where they earn ad revenue.
Why would they pay LEO for content on peakd.com which doesn't earn ad revenue?
Khal said all blogs on Hive past present and future can be evergreened. That means that if Leo shows all the Hive blockchain content it all brings clicks
The only way that LEO can earn money from content is if people are viewing an ad on the leofinance.io version.
Right, so Khal needs to find a way to get the LeoFinance url versions to rank higher than peakd and hive.blog
1/2: But the reality is when you publish via peakd.com there is a snippit of code called a canonical which tells Google that their version is the original.
So Google will always rank that and thus peakd will always get the traffic.
2/2: This is why its so important to only incentivise content published via leofinance.io.
I did originally say specifically curate content posted to other communities via leofinance frontend
Okay yep, just trying to make it clear.
We all get confused with the mindset that we're a "hive community".
When the reality going forward is that we're competing front-ends trying to monetise content our own way.
It's can't be the everything app if it only sticks to one genre
That's a different argument...
Can they generate more views (and thus revenue) by niching down, or going open slather and having no direction?
Khal says they were opening to everything, so... It seems he needs to better define that to the Hive masses