Thanks for the mathematical insight into the division of existing resources! 😊
A couple of things to consider: 1) HIVE inflation is supposed to continue until 2040, so there will technically be further HIVE available for allocation. 2) Placing barriers to usage by raising the amount of HP required to perform activities will, in turn, become barriers to usage; the average consumer would prefer as few barriers as possible. Therefore there would have to be direct incentives to overcome the initial barriers.
The second factor may be one which inhibits growth of the platform if it's not addressed. The big players do not have any of those barriers, albeit at the cost of other things which we deem important (i.e. privacy, censorship resistance, etc.).
This is why the applications will likely be the ones amassing the HP in an effort to get the RCs to their users.
Hence the onus is being shifted to the larger players, at least for account creation and initial delegation.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It's a proper concept if executed correctly, but would likely require the generosity of big players / benefactors. They would likely also have to reap some benefits in order to regularly do this. Community growth alone may not be a sufficient motivator, but may work in conjunction with other incentives.
A very exciting future for Hive!