Yes, I did read it. You write it yourself, being on the list means you researched me, in relation to accountability of the witnesses. But why? There must be thousands of accounts more you could have researched. Why me (and some 1700 others)? To what end? Perhaps that is also in those few sentences, but then it's to condensed for me to understand. Some more explanation would be welcome
Yes, I did read it. You write it yourself, being on the list means you researched me, in relation to accountability of the witnesses. But why? There must be thousands of accounts more you could have researched. Why me (and some 1700 others)? To what end? Perhaps that is also in those few sentences, but then it's to condensed for me to understand. Some more explanation would be welcome
Posted using Dapplr
.
That's quite an ambitious research goal. I wonder if you can prove any thing conclusevily, instead of presenting circumstantial evidence.
.