It is not a bad idea. We all want HBD to be pegged. But using rewards pool for that is just not the way to go, especially after everything we have accomplished so far. It would be great to see all those voters for those posts participate in voting for real authors.
My thoughts are, leave the rewards pool alone. HDF has a lot of money to fund many various projects.
True,
But all the fixes of the peg look amateur to me. HDB doesn't work since day one. Why we try to fix a broken system this way? It's ok for leeching some funds and burn some Hive, but does it really make sense long term?
If they really want it stable. Open the fund/transfer from DAO + stabilization for every user. Then we become funds 100x higher than the current proposal because Hive users can make a return out of it.
Would long-term stable HDB and IMO less amateur :)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I personally think removing haircut would fix it. But I am no economist, so don't know. But @smooth and @blocktrades have great ideas I think that can actually fix it. I just don't want it to be at the cost of author rewards.