You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Project Nessie - Price Gouging The Amazon Style

in LeoFinancelast year

I agree with your explanation, and it is true in general. However, there may be situations when there is no fraud or coercion, but there is deception, collusion, manipulation and lack of transparency which may put one side in disadvantage in the transactions.

There is no issue with Amazon pricing its products as they choose. However, the allegation is that Amazon actively was involved in forcing merchants that use their platform to raise the prices or keep them above certain price points or face not favorable consequence. Maybe this too is ok for Amazon to do as the owner of the marketplace. But lack of transparency of such schemes makes it deceptive practice and not puts buyers in disadvantage. If this indeed is true, the information revealed will better equip buyers in making decisions whether to enter the transaction or not. In other words, if merchants are forced to keep prices high, it may be possible to the same product to be available for better price elsewhere, maybe merchants' websites.

Sort:  

However, there may be situations when there is no fraud or coercion, but there is deception, collusion, manipulation and lack of transparency which may put one side in disadvantage in the transactions.

I agree, in part.

Deception of any kind, as part of a financial transaction, is fraud.

Collusion is generally illegal, unless it’s collusion with the government (collusion with the government is legal, but represents the worst type of collusion, imho).

Manipulation in a financial transaction would generally be fraud or coercion.

Lack of transparency would be a gray area. If there’s a defect in my product that I know about but don’t disclose, that’s fraud. If I know that my competitor is about to release a new product that’s going to make mine obsolete, I might slash my prices to reduce my inventory, but I have no duty to disclose my reasons for doing so.

BTW, I am not defending or accusing Amazon in any way, shape, or form. I’m just trying to provide some clarity about terminology.

I always bristle when I hear the term “price gouging” (because it generally implies a falsehood about free exchange). That’s why I usually take the opportunity to explain free exchange (and the fact that both parties are better off, if the exchange is truly free of fraud or coercion).

Thank you for explaining in details! I understand better now. Makes perfect sense.