This is an interesting chart:
Inleo team published a post two weeks ago, in which they claim to have over 13,000 MAU.
What makes the difference in their stats and yours?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is an interesting chart:
Inleo team published a post two weeks ago, in which they claim to have over 13,000 MAU.
What makes the difference in their stats and yours?
The data above is about users who have posted, commented or made a thread using the inleo frontend. In the table you are refering to there is a data on consumers ... I'm guessing it is users who are reading only without posting
Well, then I would hardly call these users active users as described in the original proposal.
Goog q, also wonder where the 13K monthly users are, maybe they count web page impressions?
Or they simply count every account that upvoted content published from Inleo. Even these in voting trails.
I was just about to check that post vs this post too. I'd be very interested to know the Leo team's method for qualifying what a MAU is.
Especially when the original proposal promised onboarding active users, or returning the funds :)
Man, if I opened the can of all of my issues with the way Leo is run and the things they've said I'd be chased off the platform. But I will say, there was 0% chance of them ever even considering returning a goddamn cent. Startup-energy-tech-bros are the wrong people to trust with having enough self-reflection or responsibility to actually follow through with a promise like that.
Well said :)
Active consumers include the voters and possibly reblogs. They are not visitors to the website. Monthly unique visitors are 88K.
https://dashboard.simpleanalytics.com/inleo.io
Well, then there are likely many voting trails. All data suggest the goal set by the original proposal was not met, and then it is not really surprising the current one is far from passing.
At least a few hundred are from voting trails. It is primarily the veterans that use voting trails. I don't think most of the new users even know about the voting trails.
If the Inleo report was more transparent, we wouldn't have to make assumptions.