It was not a basic grammar and structure correction but generated most of the writing.
Hive values original content, not content generated by a machine.
For example, if you try publishing this type of content on Medium, your account will be restricted and demonetised.
PeakD is part of the same Hive ecosystem. Just as hive.blog, it is one of many frontends built on the hive blockchain.
Whatever you publish on any Hive frontend, will be automatically visible on all other frontends.
I appreciate your perspective, but I believe it's important to consider several points:
The definition of 'original content' is evolving with technology. Using AI as an assistance tool doesn't necessarily invalidate the originality of thought and content curation.
The comparison with Medium isn't entirely applicable, as Hive prides itself on being a decentralized platform with diverse perspectives.
As PeakD clearly stated, HiveWatchers' position represents a decision by a small group, not a consensus of the entire Hive community or an official blockchain rule.
PeakD also reminded users that participation in the reward system is optional. Users can choose not to interact with groups whose policies they don't share.
Research, topic selection, question formulation, and final editing remain intellectual processes performed by humans, even when AI is used as a tool.
I believe it's crucial to maintain an open dialogue about integrating new technologies into content creation, rather than adopting restrictive stances that may limit innovation and creative expression on the platform.
https://hive.blog/ai/@hivewatchers/ai-generated-content-not-original-content
You can decline rewards before publishing such content and the issue will solve itself.