This is something to really think about. Gotta re-examine how we do our own curation especially on threads. I do keep in mind those who are constantly selling their LEO and try to not upvote their contents even with my meager vote value, lol! Ironically, it is often observed that some of those are still being incentivised generously by big stakeholders and their trails.
On the other hand, there are those who share other links from outside of the LEO UI but are keeping their stacks and powering up. They are in my opinion some of those better to be supported.
The other kettle of fish you mentioned do make me wonder at times.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It's all about trying to get to a point where the ecosystem is sustainable.
If the LEO token (or any Hive community token) can't sustain new authors selling the tokens they're being paid to generate content, then it is unsustainable.
This is why generating revenue from the content those authors are providing, and then using that revenue to buy/burn the token, is key.
Once the ecosystem sustainable, then it doesn't matter who is taking profit.
To get to this point, it's up to those with stake to incentivise the type of content that generates the most value (ad revenue).
Do share your thoughts!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yeah, was to edit my comment yesterday after realizing it was far from what your point was but it's already there so I let it be😁
Cheers😉
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta