Hello everyone, It's me @intishar once again with another new article. And this time I am going to discuss about ChatGPT. I hope you will enjoy reading it. So let's start.
Technology is created or comes to us to make our life easier and more comfortable and try to give us some advantages of that technology. But we also know that everything comes to us in pairs. That means if there exist some advantages then there will be some disadvantages at the same time. And in recent times, one of the most popular developed technology is AI ( Artificial Intelligence ) and ChatGPT is a part of it. It's a great development of technology but in this hive platform, several people use ChatGPT for writing articles and trying to earn rewards without making any effort. And I don't support it. In fact, most users of this platform don't support it.
So do you think that ChatGPT is the reason behind it? Do you wanna blame technology for it?
In this case, I wanna suggest you read the article "The future; should we fear humans or technology?" written by @george-dee published approximately 3 weeks ago. He tried to make us understand that technology doesn't do any evil and it doesn't have any own ability to do it. Technology does those things for us which are designed by us or we humans wanna do using the technology. And for that reason, he said in the upcoming future technology is not a real threat to us. We, humans, are the real threat to us.
I agree with him and in the case of writing articles using ChatGPT, I don't blame ChatGPT or technology. I blame those people who are misusing ChatGPT for earning rewards without doing anything, not the ChatGPT.
As I said that we humans are responsible for the positive or negative effects of ChatGPT. If we choose the use it positively, It will bring positive results.
I am explaining it now.
screenshot captured by me from ChatGPT for testing purpose
At first, I wanna explain how ChatGPT can help us while writing an article. I published an article approximately 10 months ago about Requirment to write an article where I said that sometimes we face difficulties to find a topic to write and ChatGPT can help us to find a topic to write. In the case of selecting a topic, ChatGPT is very helpful. I gave a command to ChatGPT to give me some topics to write and it provided me with 10 topics and I can choose one to write.
After selecting a topic we need information and knowledge to write an article. I heard that knowledge is power and information helps us to increase knowledge. Without knowledge, we can't write any articles. We can gain knowledge related to article topics from everywhere. Even our daily life experience is a source of knowledge. Whenever we wanna know something we google it first then we find the information after visiting several links. But ChatGPT can help us by providing us with that information within a short time and in a sequence. So it can help us to gain knowledge within a short time. Then we can write articles combining our thoughts, experience, and knowledge.
I think we can use ChatGPT in positive ways. We just need to set a positive mindset and ensure its positive uses.
Special thanks to @Hivewatchers who are trying to make this platform better to best. They are trying to detect those users who write articles just by writing a few words.
If you think that I violated any rules of this platform or my word hurting you or i made any mistakes here , let me inform about it through comments or my other social network . I will try to correct it if I made any mistakes.
Find me in social media : Telegram Twitter
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @intishar ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
Oddly, the two times I used chatGBT for research, it gave me incorrect information.
Even worse, the program did not give me links to the resources it used.
The program seems to repeat popular narratives.
This same problem occurs with the Google Page Rank system. The google page rank system lists search results by the number of links connecting to a page.
The Page Rank system is notorious for spreading false information as people tend to repeat provocative information. A clickbait site about a topic might receive a higher page rank than an researched response.
!WINE
Congratulations, @irivers You Successfully Shared 0.100 WINEX With @intishar.
You Earned 0.100 WINEX As Curation Reward.
You Utilized 1/1 Successful Calls.
Contact Us : WINEX Token Discord Channel
WINEX Current Market Price : 0.200
Swap Your Hive <=> Swap.Hive With Industry Lowest Fee (0.1%) : Click This Link
Read Latest Updates Or Contact Us
Then, it's bad. If it provide wrong information then we all need to be careful. I was also planning to use it use it for research purposes. But it seems we can't blindly believe ChatGPT.
Thank you for providing this information and I think you saved my time🙂
Thank you again for reading with patience 🙂.
!PIZZA
Hi @intishar thanks for this contribution with your publication. I had not heard of this app. You are so right we are usually the ones who complicate things. Until another opportunity, happy week.
I think you have here about it. May be you heard about writing article using AI or AI generated article which mostly done by Chatgpt.
Thank you for reading with patience.
Thanks for clarifying. This topic is on the table, lately but I was honestly unaware that they were made with Chatgpt.
It's my honour that somehow I am able to clarify and make you understand 😉.
Thank you very much, really in this area my knowledge is very scarce. I am grateful for these opportunities for training.
!LUV
@intishar, @marilour(2/3) sent you LUV. | tools | discord | community |
HiveWiki | 
NFT | <>< daily
PIZZA Holders sent $PIZZA tips in this post's comments:
@intishar(1/5) tipped @irivers (x1)
Learn more at https://hive.pizza.
This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.
Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating to @indiaunited. We share more than 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators in the form of IUC tokens. HP delegators and IUC token holders also get upto 20% additional vote weight.
Here are some handy links for delegations: 100HP, 250HP, 500HP, 1000HP.
100% of the rewards from this comment goes to the curator for their manual curation efforts. Please encourage the curator @bhattg by upvoting this comment and support the community by voting the posts made by @indiaunited.
Thank you for continuous support 🙂.
Technology doesn't do evil. It yields to the command of humans. It is just a tool. Humans are the ones who gave it mind.
Yes that's right and for that reason if we want to blame someone for negative impact then it would be human not that technology.
Yes, that's correct.
There's no harm in using Chat GPT for research purposes and positivity. The world is evolving and we have to evolve with it. However, taking advantage of that in a bid to deceive the public of your own creativity completely abuses the purpose for which it was created. It was nice of you to share this with us. Have a great day.
Popped in from #dreemport
Yes, we can take it positively and it will be better for everyone. But in case of research propose I heard that ChatGPT don't provide detail and real information. So I will try to be careful when I use it in research purposes.
Thank you for reading with patience.
You raised interesting point - I am not long enough on hive to get any problems with finding a topic for my posts, but I agree with your statement, that technology itself it is not an issue here.
I would rather say that the real problem is mindless curation - voting on posts without actually reading the posts. I know, that AI is getting better every day, and detecting it, without proper tools is not always an easy task. Especially, if someone is experienced with using AI. Usually is enough to check history of articles, which were posted by this particular person to see, if person is genuine, or just try to earn easy bucks with no effort. Plus engagement with the community.
Better vote less, but by more thorough about it. Or just delegate RC to people/curators with time on their hands:)
Sometimes it's hard to detect AI generated article and curation occuring for it. But I am hopeful that with time it will be easy to detect such kind of user.
I believe that nobody deserve single upvote without making any effort.
Thank you for reading with patience.